Mishka Zena

Endless Pondering

Transcript of Fernandes’ Interview

Interview with Gallaudet University’s Jane Fernandes
Washington Post Radio Interview, Oct. 16, 2006

Tuesday, October 17, 2006; 4:21 PM

[italics] Washington Post Radio’s Mike Moss interviewed the Post’s
Monica Norton and incoming Gallaudet University president Jane
Fernandes about the protests over Fernandes’ presidency and transition
at the school. Dr. Fernandes spoke through an unidentified interpreter.
[italics]

[Triple round parentheses show where transcriptionist added words.
Triple square parentheses show where transcriptionist omitted words.
The square-round-square parentheses pattern shows corrections of the
transcript.]

Mike Moss: Gallaudet [GAL-ya-det (phonetic)] University has been in a
state of turmoil after a three day shutdown over the choice of Jane
Fernandes to be the incoming president. The nationally renowned school
for the deaf has reopened after 133 protesters were arrested. And
joining us this morning to take a look into the situation (((is))) Post
assistant Maryland editor Monica Norton joins us as does Jane Fernandes
who is the president designate at Gallaudet [GALL-ya-det (phonetic)]
University, and Ms. Fernandes will be represented by her sign language
interpreter who is with us here this morning on Washington Post Radio.
I want to thank y’all for joining [([being with])] us.

Let me begin with you Monica.

Monica Norton: Thank you.

Moss: What is it about Jane Fernandes that the students don’t like?

Norton: [Speaking on the telephone:] Well students have given a number
of reasons. When the protest began in May, it actually began with some
black students and staff on campus upset about the presidential search
process which had eliminated a strong black candidate in favor of three
whites. There were also some faculty members who were upset that the
board of trustees had not consulted them, and other students had said
[[[that]]] they didn’t think that Dr. Fernandes would be a good
representative for the [([their])] community.

Moss: But why don’t they think that she would be a good representative
for their community?

Norton: Well, some have complained that in her tenure as provost there
– she has been provost — for six years, they are upset about her
leadership and that she has [([had])] not exactly reached out to them

[([Norton: Well, some have complained that in her tenure as provost
there -- she has been provost for six years -- they are upset about her
leadership and that she has [([had])] not exactly reached out to
them])]

Moss: [[[OK]]] Let me turn now to Jane Fernandes, and again, she will
be represented by her sign language interpreter. Ms. Fernandes, welcome
to Washington Post Radio. I want to ask you whether you think
[[[that]]] in some way, shape, or form you are being discriminated
against here by the student body which doesn’t see you as deaf perhaps
as they are?

Jane Fernandes: [Long pause...Probable sound of chair tilting.
Interpreter speaking on telephone speakerphone:] Good morning, yes, I
don’t know. I was born deaf, so — my mother is deaf, my brother is
deaf, I have a niece who is deaf. So, if that’s not deaf, I don’t know
how to explain what deaf is.

Moss: How do you feel about these protests? What do they say to you?
Why do you think these students are so disliking of your selection that
they are staging these protests, and in the case of 133 of them,
getting themselves arrested?

Fernandes: I think that we are in a time of great change in the deaf
community [sounds of Fernandes whispering clear spoken English in the
background], and in any time of change, I think that that brings with
it resistance and it brings fear and people are afraid of change, and I
just happen to be in the position [[[that]]] I am in right now, and I
believe it’s not really about me, and I’m not taking it personally. I
believe there are some issues of decisions I made when I was provost
that did not please some people on campus, and I believe that is a
separate issue from what the deaf community is going through right now.

Moss: Now you say that the change is what the root of all that [([of
this])] is. What change do you represent?

[Fernandes' actual voice, whispering [very clear spoken English: Umm...
I represent change--]

Fernandes [interpreter]: [[[Uh]]] I represent a kind of change in
leading Gallaudet University into the future, being an inclusive deaf
university. Which means [[[that]]] we include all different kinds of
deaf people and we welcome and value different kinds of deaf people
[[[here]]] at Gallaudet University. And the changes are, for example,
more and more deaf babies now are getting cochlear implants, [[[and]]]
so that means [[[that]]] more deaf children are hearing better and
speaking better. And I believe [[[that]]] Gallaudet University is here
for those children as well, [Host: "Mmm hmm (agreeing)] as well as for
the children who grew up with sign language as their first language and
those who go to deaf schools. I believe that Gallaudet University has a
birthright for all deaf children and adults in the United States, and
that’s the change that I represent, and it’s scary for a lot of deaf
people.

Moss: Why?

[Fernandes' actual voice, whispering: Umm... I think it represents
change--]

Fernandes: Well, it represents change. It means that people [loud beep
in background (telephone intercom?)] who have seen Gallaudet as their
own, [Fernandes continues to whisper in clear spoken English] they
understand that when we welcome more diverse deaf people into the
community, that will influence our culture. It will influence our
language. But in turn we will influence them, and we will create a new
order of deaf people.

Moss: Have you failed to be able to reassure these students that this
change would be good?

[Fernandes' own voice, whispering: I think it's going to take time--]

Fernandes: I think it’s going to take time. I don’t think [[[that]]]
it’s going to be over fast. I think [[[this]]] is going to take perhaps
a few years of work, of hard work, in order to clarify the direction
that Gallaudet University is going in and to assure [insure
(interpreter error)] everyone that the center of Gallaudet University
always is, was, [([was, is])] and will be American Sign Language and
deaf culture, and that is one thing that [audible sound of computer in
the background of Fernandes' location--sounds like the "Finished
downloading" signal] will never go away. Deaf culture and American Sign
Language are here to stay, and we want to make sure that we are clear
about that.

Moss: We are talking about the –

Fernandes: — [[[(unclear:) We'd like]]] to expand the core of the
school here, to be able to include different kinds of deaf people.

Moss: We are talking about the situation over at Gallaudet [GALL-ya-det
(phonetic)]University here on Washington Post Radio this morning with a
sign language interpreter for Jane Fernandes, who is next to the
interpreter, and Monica Norton, who is the assistant Maryland editor at
the Post, an education reporter as well. Jane Fernandes, have you
considered that if it’s going to take years to work through all this,
whether that is too disruptive to the university itself and therefore
whether you should continue to be the incoming president? Have you
considered stepping away?

Fernandes: I have not considered resigning. I don’t believe for one
second that my resignation would help. I think that my resignation
would hurt the university very badly, and I think that my resignation
would result in years of instability ["Finished downloading" signal on
computer in the background at Fernandes' office] in the governance of
the university itself, and right now, we have a very strong and unified
governance, and I need to be able to take control and lead the
university. Right now, I am the president designate. I am not in a
position of leadership. President Jordan is still acting as president.
So I am looking forward to January 2007 when I do become president of
Gallaudet University and working with the community to make Gallaudet
University stronger.

Moss: Alright. I want to thank y’all for joining us this morning. Jane
Fernandes, the incoming president of [([at])] Gallaudet [GALL-ya-det
(phonetic)] University, and Monica Norton of the Washington Post.

Transcript:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/17/AR2006101700872.html

Audio:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/audio/2006/10/16/AU2006101600271.html

October 18, 2006 - Posted by Mishka Zena | Uncategorized | | 9 Comments

9 Comments »

  1. Ohhh, now I see the new order does not mean that Jane is creating a new Deaf order, but to influence the newbies to the Deaf World and eventually itll beocme thier “new order.” Weird choice of words, but its important that we do not disort her words to support our cause.

    Comment by Melody | October 18, 2006 | Reply

  2. Gallaudet [GAL-ya-det (phonetic)]

    Holy cow, I’ve been saying it wrong all these years!! Like ga-la-DET. Gee whiz, this is going to be a tough habit to break.

    Comment by Tom Willard | October 18, 2006 | Reply

  3. What’s up with the whispering??

    if she can talk so well, why use an interpreter to voice for her?

    Odd…

    Comment by cyansquirrel | October 18, 2006 | Reply

  4. It is wonderful to eventually have the transcript. I am still very concerned about this “new order of Deaf people”. It was a deliberately used expression invoking the utopian theories of social change that all failed miserably and only cause suffereing for many people. As far as I see cochlear implanted students are not much different from other Deaf students, they also protest against Fernandes for that matter!!! ;)

    Comment by testing_the_truth | October 18, 2006 | Reply

  5. I was surprised to hear the interpreter voicing for her. I was under the impression she spoke very well, too.

    Comment by Mishka Zena | October 18, 2006 | Reply

  6. Some deaf people can talk very well but they prefer to have an interpreter at their side for a safety reason. Also, they often use interpreters to prove that they are proud to be deaf people to use that service.

    It happened to my mom who’s hard of hearing person who could talk very well on telephone or in the meeting with hearing employees. I’m profoundly Deaf person myself and 96′ Gallaudet Alumni. I knew nothing of how to speak well, not even one word.

    I asked her why she used interpreters to voice for her as she talked to them in American Sign Language if she could talk very well and lipreading very well. She chose to have interpreters for safety reasons (she knew she’s not a perfect speaker) and prove herself as Deaf top employer to run the company with hundreds of hearing employees under her. Also, she loved to educate hearing people that Deaf people can do everything. She’s retired for a few years now.

    My mom, my whole family (yes, included my hearing family members!) and I are fully support Unity for Gallaudet!

    Comment by JOY | October 18, 2006 | Reply

  7. Jane,
    There is no new order, that is only new technology! As it has always been and always be under your direction along with countless others, is that there are no more deaf people you are the only ones! Baloney! there are countless others and because of the oppression directed at them via audiologists, doctors, parents, educators they do not find themselves until they attend Gallaudet! Yourself included, if as you state you have a deaf mother, deaf brother, deaf niece why in the world did it take for you to ge to Iowa and finally acknowledge there is a deaf world and community? I know for a fact it wasnt the corn, as i was born in Iowa, have deaf parents it is the simple fact that people like you continue to oppress, continue to look at the audiologic ways of fixing the deaf community! Enough already, everyone is included some take the long way, yourself included! Yet that does not mean there is a “fix” or a need to change! The only thing pertinent here is that your leadership abilties and personality can NOT LEAD! Just as OIL and WATER can NOT MIX!

    Give IT UP! For the Sake of Mankind and World Peace!

    TB

    Comment by There is no new order! | October 18, 2006 | Reply

  8. I read the transcript last night before i went to bed. The transcript was the last thing on my mind before slipping into dreamland.
    I am trying to find the right words describe how i felt after reading the transcript. The first word that comes to my mind is frightened.
    I posted a comment after the first post on JK’s radio talk. You see, it is very easy to misunderstand when a radio tactic is done. We all heard “CI babies think better” and there was an uproar including myself. But with the official transcript became available; we see that JK did not say “CI babies think better” but said “And the changes are, for example, more and more deaf babies now are getting cochlear implants, [[[and]]]so that means [[[that]]] more deaf children are hearing better and speaking better”.
    Okay, my point is why speak on a radio? Why not speak on a TV news? Or speak in the front of audience of Gally students, Faculty, etc? JK has not yet done that. Deaf people are visual. She of all people should know that.

    We learned something new (at least its new for me) that her mother is deaf, her brother is deaf. I found that interesting cuz she finally showed a very small part of herself. JK has been so impersonal and conscending.

    The frightening part is JK does not know how to do public speaking. How can she approach the Congress/Senate and testify what Gally needs? How can she convince them Gally need more monies? She has not yet come forward and try to convince us that she is a perfect candidate!

    She harped about changes. OH PUHlease! “the change” has already been part of Gallaudet’s history. I would think the “change” began decades ago when Oral Method first started, Cued Speech, even CI (which began late 70’s), etc.
    Today’s and future “changes” will not be any different from 3 decades ago. Don’t forget every generation change! Don’t forget the “Rubella babies” generation; there were a huge population of “Rubella babies” who came into college age; Gallaudet opened NW campus early 80’s to accomodate the “Rubella babies” boom, now adults. When the “Rubella babies” graduated from Gally the population went down. Every college or university goes through constant “changes”. Today’s generation (born after 1982) is very different from 80’s generation.

    The point I am trying to convey is JK is a very poor public speaker. I am repeating myself, how in the world can she speak in the front of Congress/Senate? She should have done research before approaching the audience.

    This is very distressing to know that IKJ would choose JK. Perhaps IKJ really do not know any better because himself was late deafened and is a terrible signer? We might excuse IKJ because he was a hearing person all of his growing years until his 20’s. We cannot excuse JK because she was born deaf! Her mother is deaf! Her brother is deaf!
    SCARY!

    Comment by vickie lou | October 18, 2006 | Reply

  9. “New Order”

    Didn’t I see that somewhere else?

    It is associated with Nazism
    http://www.theneworder.org/

    Another one:
    http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/10/birth-pangs-of-new-order.html

    Another one:
    http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/laila_elhaddad/2006/04/post_42.html

    Another one:
    http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+id0036)

    Another one:
    http://www.pangaro.com/proposals/rise-of-proposal.html

    Antoher one but has to be the best (note how much in common with what JKF is trying to do?)
    http://www.sweetliberty.org/nobarbarians1.htm

    all have one common thread – CONTROL

    The very nature of the Deaf – they’re INDEPENDENTS and very hard to control. Could the cochlear implants (technology) be the first step toward control? Could it be the Deaf keeping the humanity in check to prevent any attempt to control by some elements?

    Comment by W. David Samuelsen | October 18, 2006 | Reply


Leave a comment